Quality of Work Life (QWL) on Professional Care Providers at X Hospital, Jakarta

Fanya Fanya, H. Abdul Kadir, Rokiah Kusumapradja

Abstract


Productivity is affected by services that will be provided them and influenced in the quality of work life characteristics such as age also years of service on professional care provider themselves. The purpose of the study is conducted at X Hospital to provide empirical evidence in provider influence characteristics and quality of work life (QWL) towards the productivity of professional care providers at hospital X. Here, we used quantitative causality as a research methodology. The professional respondents are a care providers who work in hospital x with survey quantitative. Here, we analyze the data using Structural Equation Modelling with AMOS applications. The results showed the influence of provider characteristics and quality of work life / QWL towards work productivity. The positive effect occurs between the characteristics of the provider with the quality of work life and productivity, but there is a negative influence on the quality of work life on work productivity. Characteristics of the providers at X hospital are dominated by those with high age and long working period. The quality of work life of X hospital is high, with the work productivity of PPA at hospital X showing a moderate value. The findings of this study are the higher age and longer the years of service of professional care providers at X hospital, resulting in a high quality of work life with moderate / normal work productivity

Keywords


Productivity, quality of work life, provider characteristics

Full Text:

PDF

References


. Mali P.,1978. Improving total productivity: MBO strategies for business, government, and not-for-profit organizations. Wiley; First Edition.

. Letvak. 2008. Factors influencing work productivity and intent to stay in nursing. Nursing economic. 26 (3).

. Timpe, D.A. 1989. Produktivitas: seri manajemen sumber daya manusia. Jakarta: Alex Media Komputindo.

. Fields, Mitchel W., and James W. Thacker, 1992, Influence of Quality of Work Life on Company and Union Commitment”. Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 35, No. 2 p.439-450

. Zin, Razali Mat. 2004. Perception of Professional Engineers Toward Quality of Worklife and Organizational Commitment. Gadjah Mada International Journal of BusinessSeptember 2004, Vol. 6, No. 3, pp. 323 - 334

. Lars A., Greenberg, L.S., 2007. Client Emotional Productivity. European Psychotherapy. Vol. 7 No. 1 p. 137-152.

. Mohammed J Almalki ,; Gerry FitzGerald &; Michele Clark. 2012. Quality of work life among primary health care nurses in the Jazan region, Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study. Human Resources for Healthvolume 10, Article number: 30 .

. Umstot, D. 1988. Understanding Organizational Behavior. West Publishing Company. USA.

. Robbins, S. P. 2001. Perilaku organisasi. 16th ed, Jilid 1. Jakarta: PT.Prehallindo

. Mohammed J Almalki, Gerry FitzGerald, Michele Clark. 2012. The relationship between quality of work life and turnover intention of primary health care nurses in Saudi Arabia. Almalki et al. BMC Health Services Research 2012, 12:314

. Hair, J. F., Black. W. C., Babin. B. J.; and Anderson. R. E. 2010. Multivariate Data Analysis, 7th ed. Pearson Prentice Hall, New Jersey.

. McEvoy G. M., and W. F. Cascio, 1989, Cumulative Evidence of the Relationship between Employee Age and Job Performance, Journal of Applied Psychology, February 1989, p. 11 – 17

. Barzegar. 2012. Relationship between leadership behavior, quality of work life and human resources productivity: data from Iran International Journal of Hospital Research, 1(1).1-14.

. Brooks, B. A., & Anderson, M. A. 2005. Defining quality of nursing work life. Nursing Economics, 23 (6), 319-326

. Mejbel, A.A.E, et al. 2013. The Drivers of Quality of Working Life (QWL): A Critical Review. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 7(10): 398-405.

. Walton, R.E., 1973. Quality of Work Life. Sloan Management Review, 15(1): 11-12.

. Frediyan, S.M, et al. 2017. Pengaruh Quality Of Work Life (QWL) Terhadap Produktivitas Kerja Karyawan Menggunakan Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) (Studi Kasus: PT. Krakatau Tirta Industri). Jurnal Teknik Industri Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa Vol.5 No.2 Juli 2017.

. N. D. Nayeri, T. Salehi & A.A. Noghabi. 2011. Quality of work life and productivity among Iranian nurses, Contemporary Nurse, 39:1, 106-11


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.


Supported by :







Indexed by :